Friday, June 1, 2012

Régebbi karkötőim




Astrid:
I saw Fanny and Alexander as a child. Therefore, I thought it was a fim suitable for children. Now I was shocked to find out it was K16 – I had bought the DVD to watch with a ten year old...I remembered the film as a sweet, beautiful and honest depiction of family, Christmas, tradition, beauty... I remembered the maid having sex with one of the family sons, but I still thought this was a feel-good film for kiddies.This whole misconception and the total failure of my memory seems somewhat crucial in thinking back on my childhood. Was I free of overprotection or was I in fact under-protected? It seemed to be a normal thing back then to go to a friend's house and watch a horror film or Bodyguard at the age of 8.

Memory is an unreliable living part of me. It changes and alters my reality, sometimes protecting me, other times exposing me to my past. As I relived Fanny and Alexander, I wonder why I was allowed to watch this film and where I saw it in the first place. Was it a great thing that I was not totally protected from the adult world growing up? That's what fascinated me about this film, peeking into secret lives of adults. This time I was baffled by the cruelty and fright present in the film; the dangerous murderous priest, the unhappiness that dried old people to the bone, the mysterious ghosts that haunted only children. Did I take all that for granted as a child or did I not notice?

Ingmar Bergman is a cinema god, his imagination is vast, decorous and completely truthful at the same time. We haven't written about his films here because we've had a subtitle problem (no English subtitles in the Scandinavian boxes). Still, I have gone through periods (summers) similar to my Allen moods, where I only watch Bergman films, so he has truly been neglected here. Fanny and Alexander shows Bergman's ability to empathize with his subjects and his unwillingness to simplify characters, stories or life at large. Events move from one to another seamlessly, never releasing the viewer from tension even though places and people change. It all flows like liquid. If I could choose a director for my biopic, it would be B.

Nick:
I was in this shop today that  recently opened in Helsinki called Tiger. It's a Swedish brand and it's basically a high class version of your classic Euro store or Everything-for-a-pound shop. So we blew some money on nonsense we don't need (black candles, picture frames etc.). Astrid made the comment that the store is without ethics and therefore shouldn't be supported. Rather like Ikea, H&M and a few other Swedish consumer ideas the people that make the goods in these stores don't get paid. It's the new liberalism that Sweden is exporting around the world. Exploitation of cheap labor without guilt. As trade and consumerism reach the end of their natural cycle, Sweden is just honestly saying, "Here, it's cheap, don't worry where it came from, looks nice eh?" It's hard to fault the casual Swedish way. I am constantly struggling to earn a living right now, yet I can easily blow some Euros on goods descended from some far off sweatshop. And, it's not as if the rest of the world isn't doing the same eh? Why am I holding the Swedes up as an example?

Well,  two wrongs dont make a right and maybe I'm just purging my own guilt caused by some useless consumerism. Maybe living in Finland for many years has meant that the feelings of inferiority as regards Sweden felt by Finns is finally rubbing off on me. Of course, amongst many other pursuits, I can always go to the films of Ingmar Bergman for validity of Swedish goodness and ignore the modern consumer injustices of the world. Another film about aristocracy and the rich, us have not's obsession. Fanny and Alexander however is never in awe of the wealth or judgmental of it, it merely is there. If anything the movie rather humanizes these well-off  Swedish denizens. Fanny and Alexander further more never patronizes the audience, it just merely involves us in these lives, regardless of class.

I haven't watched so many Bergman movies (Seventh Seal, Wild Strawberries, Cries & Whispers). But those that I have are astonishing. Bergman musing on the human condition always seems revelatory to me. But he also shows me a genuine humor and humility about the Swedish people that I find truly humbling and recalls a great feeling I get whenever I visit the country. Fanny and Alexander is far more modern than I realized (I always thought it was a 1970's picture). Its brilliant tales of the Ekdal family and the sometimes traumatic experiences of the young children Fanny and Alexander, still feel like nothing else out there. This is cinema in its essence.

Gyöngyszövött karkötők





Nick :
Some things are culturally relevant to me yet don't seem to translate into other cultures/countries. I've tried to convince Astrid of the qualities of the Carry On Series. I dont think she's quite grasped the importance  these films hold for me. Actually, I've not met any Finns who have any real experience with these most highly valued of films. Bar the odd The Smiths best of album cover, most people outside of Britain probably don't know the legendary cast of these films. When I watch a Carry On one does want to burst into song..."take me back to dear old Blighty"

Regular Carry On star Charles Hawtrey gracing The Best Of The Smiths

There are no comic heroes as great as Kenneth Williams, Charles Hawtrey, Sid James, Kenneth Connor, Peter Butterworth, Hattie Jacques, Bernard Bresslaw, Joan Sims, Barbara Windsor and Jim Dale of the regular Carry On stars. These actors are faces I grew up with. Everyone in Britain knew these people. You can forget your Charlie Chaplin and your Buster Keaton or Steve Martin or your Woody Allen.  This is comedy gold from a different level of laughter. Carry On Screaming brings us  the usual camp play and sexual innuendo whilst spoofing the Hammer Horror films. It has Harry H Corbett in the lead role (his only Carry On) and often has him "copping an earful from 'er indoors." - played by the ever reliable Joan Sims.

Regulars Williams and Butterworth feature strongly as well as a great cameo in a public toilet from Charles Hawtrey. Carry On Screaming is by no means my favorite Carry On, but it's still very much better than nearly any picture ever made in the history of film. Only the other Carry Ons are comparable. Good enough reason to watch? Here's another: My mate Mr Greeves loves these films and that's good enough for me, it should be for you too.


Astrid:
A long time ago I watched Carry On Screaming! with Nick on VCR – back when we had a telly and all that (it was a very short-lived time, especially with the VCR). As it was a long time ago, I was young, easily bored, and possessed even less of a sense of humour than now...so I felt offended by the film.
Then for a longish period of time we had a DVD version of the same film on our shelf (a gift from a friend). I refused to watch the movie based on my memory from last time, so there it sat in its wrapping.

Sometimes Nick manages to be a sneaky behind-the-scenes-organizer...the other day he surprised me by having promised his daughter that we can all watch Carry On Screaming! together! Apparently the dirty jokes would be lost on her, so it would appear as an innocent slap-stick comedy in her eyes. Indeed she was entertained, but to my great surprise: so was I.

Yes, it is a naughty little comedy that pokes fun at old story telling traditions (in this case the Gothic genre), other movies, gender stereotypes and so on. The film is also distinctly English and clearly a child of the 1960s. It reminded me of What's New Pussycat, and the James  Bond movie Casino Royal (1967) which both introduce the young Woody Allen to cinema.
Maybe it is due to my current tiredness that my taste in films is more light and comical than usually. We have started to watch Matrix, but I'm not sure I can make it through...it's so gray, depressing in its bleakness and takes itself so seriously.